OJ's "Confession" Bogus? Investigator's Surprising Evidence Shows OJ's Son As Real Murderer

OJ’s “Confession” Bogus? Investigator’s Surprising Evidence Shows OJ’s Son As Real Murderer

1994 Premiere 'Naked Gun 33 1/3'
O.J. Simpson and Nicole Brown Simpson (Photo by Vinnie Zuffante/Archive Photos/Getty Images)

Everybody’s talking about Fox Network’s special, O.J. Simpson: The Lost Confession?, which was promoted as the ‘lost murder confession’ O.J. supposedly made in 2006. After watching the O.J, special Sunday night (3-11-18), he appeared guilty as hell with his “hypothetical” scenario of the two murders.

However, as we previously reported in 2016, private investigator William C. Dear spent several years vigorously investigating the events surrounding the 1994 murders of O.J.’s ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ron Goldman. In his book, O.J. Is Guilty But Not Of Murder, Dear reveals interesting details that were never publicized in the media that he believes points to O.J.’s troubled SON, Jason Simpson (who was 24 at the time), as the actual murderer. Below are many pieces of circumstantial evidence VillageVoice.com reported about Dear’s findings…

ojguiltybook
O.J. Is Guilty But Not Of Murder, Available On Amazon

O.J. Hired Defense Attorney For Son

– [O.J.] hired a prominent criminal defense attorney for Jason the day after the murders.

– O.J. had been accused of abusing his former wife, but nothing, Dear claimed, suggested he might be capable of viciously carving up two human beings.

– Dear is convinced that O.J. visited the crime scene, accounting for the drops of Brown’s and Goldman’s blood that did show up in his car and at his home…But by the time O.J. arrived, the killer had already gone.

– Dear theorizes that the killings were committed by someone Brown knew and would have opened her door to, someone capable of pathological brutality…and someone O.J. would protect from prosecution by risking his own freedom. He thinks that person is Jason Simpson.

Private investigator and author of "O.J. Is Guilty But Not Of Murder," William C. Dear
Private investigator and author of “O.J. Is Guilty But Not Of Murder,” William C. Dear

O.J.’s Son On Probation For Knife Assault At Time Of Murders

– Jason [Simpson] testified in a civil deposition — not made public but obtained by Dear…that he was never interviewed by either the LAPD or the D.A.’s office in the wake of the killings. And post-trial statements by police and prosecutors suggest that Jason was never considered a suspect.

– But Dear says law enforcement officials should have known that at the time of the killings, Jason was on probation for assault with a deadly weapon — he’d attacked a former employer with a knife.

– Dear also obtained…confidential hospital records, showing that Jason has been treated for a mental disorder that had triggered three suicide attempts as well as sudden, fierce and irrational attacks on other people. Dear writes that Jason attacked two former girlfriends, choking one until friends pulled him away and angrily cutting off the other’s hair with a knife.

Son’s Alibi Questionable

pic10 jason wearing knit cap

– Jason was said to have an “airtight alibi” for June 12:…The sous-chef had been filling in for his boss…until after 11 p.m. that night. (The murders probably occurred sometime between 10:15 and 10:40.) …And Jason testified in his deposition that the restaurant, Jackson’s, closed early that night, and that he left between 10 and 10:30, when he was picked up by his girlfriend. He said that after dropping his girlfriend off at her home, he went to his apartment alone and watched TV until 3 a.m.

– Dear writes that the girlfriend told him she picked Jason up earlier, before 10 p.m. And other Jackson’s employees Dear tracked down said Jason left as early as 9:30 p.m.

– Jason also testified that he departed from work that night just as he always did, carrying his personal set of chef’s knives.

– Dear solicited help from forensic experts who assured him that a chef’s boning knife, for example, would be consistent with the murder weapon — which has never been found.

Son Was Angry With O.J.’s Ex-Wife?

– Dear says that Jason…had a reason for being unhappy with his ex-stepmother that night. In his deposition, Jason said he had asked Nicole to bring her family to his restaurant on June 12, following his half sister Sydney’s dance recital…. Nicole agreed, and Jason testified that this pleased him greatly. Dear paints a portrait of Jason, as a son who had been only a disappointment to his football-legend father, and who desperately wanted recognition for his own talents as a cook. Jason, according to Dear, looked forward to showing off for Brown and her relatives, and he’d bought special foods to prepare for the night. But on June 11, Brown changed her plans, telling Jason his restaurant was too far away and too expensive, he testified.

https://twitter.com/NameSherman/status/972998049986433025

Investigator Tells How O.J.’s Son Possibly Carried Out Murders

– Dear theorizes that after dropping off his girlfriend, Jason went to Brown’s…condo to confront her about ruining his big night. Brown’s response may have angered Jason — a man with such a short fuse that he once sliced off a girlfriend’s hair with a knife in a jealous rage, according to Dear.

– After killing Brown and Goldman — who had simply walked up at the wrong time — Jason would have called his father in a state of hysteria, Dear writes. O.J. Simpson, unsure if his troubled son had committed such a horrible crime or merely hallucinated it, decided to investigate. Donning gloves and a knit cap in a hurried attempt at a disguise, he arrived at the scene and, shocked at the carnage, dropped his left glove and cap. O.J. then rushed back to Rockingham, dropped the right glove, and was seen hurrying into the house by limousine driver Allan Park.

Dear wrote that this scenario probably explains why O.J.’s responses after the murders were so odd, pointing out that O.J. didn’t ask officers how Nicole and Ron died (because he already knew, according to Dear). He also believes this explains why O.J. failed the polygraph test his attorneys conducted at that time. Thoughts ILOSM fam?’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You might like